Login/Entrar
|
Línguas/Language
|
Start Page
Search: Advanced search
Go back
Faculty:
Select faculty
Faculdade de Pedagogia / Pedagogy
Faculdade de Desenvolvimento Comunitário / Fighting with The Poor
Short Courses – Development Instructors EN
Short Courses – People’s Coach PT/EN
Short Courses
ISET - One World Presencial
EPF - Programa de 1 Ano
EPF - Programa de 3 Anos
IP Nhamatanda e Nacala
Certificado Professores Graduados Para a Resiliência Comunitária
Study area:
Select course
Lic em Pedagogia 2018
Lic em Pedagogia 2017
Lic em Pedagogia copia de 2021
Lic em Ensino de Português 2025
Pedagogia - Evolucão
Pedagogy - Licentiate I
Pegagogy - Upgrade
Lic em Ensino de Português
Licentiate in Pedagogy - Europe, 3 years
Mestrado em Pedagogia e Didáctica
Lic em Educação para Desenvolvimento Comunitário
Licentiate in Pedagogy Europe - 4 Year Program
Lic em Pedagogia 2021
Pedagogy - Licentiate I new
Lic in Education for Community Development
Lic em Educação para o Ambiente
Licentiate in Pedagogy En – 2025
Lic em Educação para Desenvolvimento Comunitário 2025
Lic em Pedagogia e Didáctica 2025
Subject:
Select subject
01 AFR - The African continent (425p)
02 BIG - Big Issues of our Time (325p)
03 HIS - History of the World (225p)
04 CEU Contemporary Europe (325p)
05 FEU The Future of Europe (325p)
06 FWP - Fighting with the Poor (400p)
07 BIP Bringing It to the Public (350p)
08 LAN Mastering Languages - English (375p)
09 MW Mastering the Material World (300p)
10 T21 The Teacher and the School of the 21st Century (125p)
11 EPI Epistemology (125p)
12 PED The Pedagogy of OWU and DNS (250p)
13 DMM The Science of the Doctrine of the Modern Method (100p)
14 HOR Horticulture. Good cooking (175p)
15 LSS Lifestyle Sustainability (125p)
16 WP The World of Politics (150p)
17 WA The World of Arts (100p)
18 OF Open Future (100p)
19 TP Teaching Practice (350)
20 SSO Specialisation Social Science (225)
21 SHS Specialization History (225)
22 MON Monograph (300)
24 SNT Specialization Natural Science (225)
Section:
Select section
BIP 1S BIP Period 1
BIP 2S BIP Period 2
BIP 3S The Public
BIP 4S Preparing the It
BIP 5S Promotion-Media
BIP 6S Performances
BIP 7S Products of BIP
BIP 8S Exam products
Type:
Training
To Tutor
For Evaluation
Exam Task
Courses
Experiences
Curriculum:
Curriculum
Curriculum+
Curriculum++
Sequence:
Title:
Wording:
Draw lessons from a show or presentation, which was performed with average results, in order to learn to identify what is needed for you to hit your audience in the heart.
Time:
hours
Introduction:
This experience assumes that a show or presentation was held within the activities of Hitting<br /> the Hearts, but the results, according to your evaluation criteria, were not fully<br /> met. You felt that you have reached the hearts only by half. That's why we<br /> call it an average quality show.<br /> <br /> But what is of interest in this? What can be learned from an average quality<br /> show, a show which ''more or less'' appealed to the audience?<br /> The first thing you should understand is that there is a relationship between<br /> the process of presentation and the result of <em>Hitting the Hearts</em>. If the process<br /> of presentation is of low quality, the results will also be low; if the quality of<br /> the show is average, the results will also be average or worse; if the quality of<br /> the show is high, the results will also be high. There is a proverb that says,<br /> ''you cannot reap good fruit from a sick tree.''<br /> <br /> This experience is important to train your ability to feel, through the reaction<br /> of the audience, the quality level of your presentation and its outcome.<br /> <br /> An audience doesn’t hide their feelings towards something that is being<br /> presented. If excited, the audience applauds, laughs and expresses feelings of<br /> empathy; but if it is unpleasant, the audience will also express their<br /> indifference and concern at the fact that it is just wasting their time.<br /> <br /> At first, you may react to this kind of assessment, made through the reactions<br /> and comments from the audience. Your argument may be that it is too<br /> subjective, it is not concrete. But think about it: <em>You have seen many different<br /> presentations; some of them pleased you while others didn’t. Think of those<br /> performances that didn’t please you: Why didn’t they motivate you? Was the<br /> message unclear? Was the message irrelevant to you?</em><br /> <br /> However, the intention here is not to please the audience; it is to educate the<br /> audience, to engage and involve people from the audience in the issue that<br /> you are presenting. Even if a person doesn’t have a malaria problem in their<br /> home, because they implement all the preventive measures, they can gladly <br /> participate in your presentation in order to learn more and motivate others. It<br /> is always like this. Hence, it is very important to make invitations informing<br /> the public a few days before your show.<br /> <br /> You really need to assess whether the show was awful, bad, mediocre, fair,<br /> good, very good or excellent. Why? Because you always want to improve<br /> your performances. You want the best in order to get the best result, reaching<br /> all the hearts. Have you ever watched a show that made you feel something?<br /> The emergence of this feeling shows that you were hit in your heart. Some<br /> people cry, others laugh – a hit heart reacts in different ways depending on the<br /> message that touched it.<br /> <br /> This is a very important moment in the work of Reaching the Public, a work<br /> of discussion and dissemination of your travel experience – but you need<br /> assessment in order to learn how to make better performances.
Directive:
1. Decide, within the core group, to take this experience together.<br /> <br /> 2. Remember an average quality show that you have made. In this step,<br /> discover and write everything on a poster – attitudes and reactions of the<br /> audience and their comments – which indicated that the show was average,<br /> a “so-so” performance.<br /> <br /> 3. Analyze the indicators to figure out which were the causes: <ul> <li>Where did you fail?</li> <li>What failed?</li> </ul> And write everything on a poster.<br /> <br /> 4. Discuss ways to avoid such failures in the future and decide what each one<br /> at the core group should do to assure this.<br /> <br /> 5. Include the teacher in the discussions.
Preview:
Files:
Requirement:
No.
Title
Type
Edit
Delete
Examination:
No
Internal
External
Language:
English
Portuguese
Search words:
Status:
In progress
';
Complete
';
Vouching:
1